Current:Home > ContactProposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot -WealthSync Hub
Proposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot
View
Date:2025-04-12 15:44:44
PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that a proposal that would let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot for voters to decide.
That sets up the biggest push to draw local authorities into immigration enforcement since the state’s landmark 2010 law that required police to question people’s immigration status in certain situations.
The court late Tuesday afternoon rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure had violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject. In an order by Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer, the state’s highest court concluded the measure satisfies the single-subject rule.
If approved by voters, the proposal, known as Proposition 314, would make it a state crime for people to cross the Arizona-Mexico border anywhere except a port of entry, give state and local law enforcement officers the power to arrest violators and let state judges order people to return to their home countries.
It also would make it a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death and require some government agencies to use a federal database to verify a noncitizen’s eligibility for benefits. The proposal will go before voters in a state expected to play a crucial role in determining which party controls the White House and the U.S. Senate. Republicans hope it will focus attention on the border and dilute the political benefits Democrats seek from an abortion-rights ballot measure.
Opponents had argued the proposal dealt with the unrelated subjects of immigration enforcement, the fentanyl crisis and the regulation of public benefits. A lower court had previously rejected those arguments.
While federal law already prohibits the unauthorized entry of migrants into the U.S., proponents of the measure say it’s needed because the federal government hasn’t done enough to stop people from crossing illegally over Arizona’s porous border with Mexico. They also said some people who enter Arizona without authorization commit identity theft and take advantage of public benefits. Opponents say the proposal would lead to racial profiling, hurt Arizona’s reputation in the business world and carry huge unfunded costs for police departments that don’t typically enforce immigration law.
In early June, the Republican-controlled Legislature voted to put the measure on the ballot, bypassing Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar measure in early March and had denounced the effort to bring the issue to voters.
This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migration.
When passing its 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they were believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics, but courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law. Earlier this week, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office said supporters of a proposal that would enshrine abortion rights in the state’s constitution had gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot. If approved, it would allow abortions until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, with exceptions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Abortion is currently legal for the first 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona.
veryGood! (377)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Can Wolves and Beavers Help Save the West From Global Warming?
- American Airlines and JetBlue must end partnership in the northeast U.S., judge rules
- Green energy gridlock
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Why RHOA's Phaedra Parks Gave Son Ayden $150,000 for His 13th Birthday
- A Tennessee company is refusing a U.S. request to recall 67 million air bag inflators
- Selling Sunset's Amanza Smith Finally Returns Home After Battle With Blood Infection in Hospital
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Cardi B's Head-Turning Paris Fashion Week Looks Will Please You
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Netflix has officially begun its plan to make users pay extra for password sharing
- Overwhelmed by Solar Projects, the Nation’s Largest Grid Operator Seeks a Two-Year Pause on Approvals
- Don’t Miss the Chance To Get This $78 Lululemon Shirt for Only $29 and More Great Finds
- Sam Taylor
- Inside Clean Energy: Recycling Solar Panels Is a Big Challenge, but Here’s Some Recent Progress
- Report: 20 of the world's richest economies, including the U.S., fuel forced labor
- Study: Pennsylvania Children Who Live Near Fracking Wells Have Higher Leukemia Risk
Recommendation
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
In Portsmouth, a Superfund Site Pollutes a Creek, Threatens a Neighborhood and Defies a Quick Fix
Intel named most faith-friendly company
Too Hot to Work, Too Hot to Play
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Shifting Sands: Carolina’s Outer Banks Face a Precarious Future
Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, Shares Update After Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer
Target is recalling nearly 5 million candles that can cause burns and lacerations