Current:Home > FinanceWisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid -WealthSync Hub
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
View
Date:2025-04-12 14:28:12
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on whether a law that legislators adopted more than a decade before the Civil War bans abortion and can still be enforced.
Abortion-rights advocates stand an excellent chance of prevailing, given that liberal justices control the court and one of them remarked on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Monday’s arguments are little more than a formality ahead of a ruling, which is expected to take weeks.
Wisconsin lawmakers passed the state’s first prohibition on abortion in 1849. That law stated that anyone who killed a fetus unless the act was to save the mother’s life was guilty of manslaughter. Legislators passed statutes about a decade later that prohibited a woman from attempting to obtain her own miscarriage. In the 1950s, lawmakers revised the law’s language to make killing an unborn child or killing the mother with the intent of destroying her unborn child a felony. The revisions allowed a doctor in consultation with two other physicians to perform an abortion to save the mother’s life.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion nationwide nullified the Wisconsin ban, but legislators never repealed it. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe two years ago, conservatives argued that the Wisconsin ban was enforceable again.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2022. He argued that a 1985 Wisconsin law that allows abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, argues the 1849 ban should be enforceable. He contends that it was never repealed and that it can co-exist with the 1985 law because that law didn’t legalize abortion at any point. Other modern-day abortion restrictions also don’t legalize the practice, he argues.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled last year that the old ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent — but not consensual abortions. The ruling emboldened Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions in Wisconsin after halting procedures after Roe was overturned.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court in February to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for lower appellate courts to rule first. The court agreed to take the case in July.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed a separate lawsuit in February asking the state Supreme Court to rule directly on whether a constitutional right to abortion exists in the state. The court agreed in July to take that case as well. The justices have yet to schedule oral arguments.
Persuading the court’s liberal majority to uphold the ban appears next to impossible. Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz stated openly during her campaign that she supports abortion rights, a major departure for a judicial candidate. Usually, such candidates refrain from speaking about their personal views to avoid the appearance of bias.
The court’s three conservative justices have accused the liberals of playing politics with abortion.
veryGood! (7538)
Related
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- One of the world's oldest books goes up for auction
- Charlotte Tilbury Muse Michaela Jaé Rodriguez On Her Fave Lip Product & Why She Does Skincare at 5 A.M.
- Inside Exes Sacha Baron Cohen and Isla Fisher’s Private World
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- 2 Muslim women were forced to remove hijabs for mug shots. NYC will pay $17.5M to settle their suit
- Levi's stock jumps 20%, boosted by Beyoncé song featuring Post Malone
- Only Julia Fox Could Make Hair Extension Shoes Look Fabulous
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- 5 lessons for young athletes (and their parents) from the NCAA Final Four basketball teams
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Tennessee court to weigh throwing out abortion ban challenge, blocking portions of the law
- NC State's Final Four men's team is no normal double-digit seed. Don't underestimate them
- WWE women's division has a big WrestleMania 40, but its 'best is yet to come'
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- What to know about next week’s total solar eclipse in the US, Mexico and Canada
- Fire outside the Vermont office of Sen. Bernie Sanders causes minor damage
- Former tribal leader in South Dakota convicted of defrauding tribe
Recommendation
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Earthquake snarls air and train travel in the New York City area
Congress returns next week eyeing Ukraine aid, Baltimore bridge funds and Mayorkas impeachment
Fire outside the Vermont office of Sen. Bernie Sanders causes minor damage
Travis Hunter, the 2
Actor in spinoff of popular TV western ‘Yellowstone’ is found dead, authorities say
Fact-checking 'Scoop': The true story behind Prince Andrew's disastrous BBC interview
99 Cents Only Stores to close all 371 spots in 'extremely difficult decision,' CEO says